Monday, March 1, 2010

Classic Berkeley


Classic Berkeley
Originally uploaded by JimHildreth
Berkeley CA homeowners have requested the Mediation Services of Jim W Hildreth of Real Estate Mediation Services to act as a neutral over a dispute involving non-disclosure.

Hildreth's specialty is disputes involving California real estate. The sellers and buyers have chosen mediation vs litigation.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Hong Kong 香港


Mediation in Hong Kong

December 10, 2009

By Alfred Ip, Partner at OLN and CEDR Accredited Mediator

From 1st January 2010, the court will require parties to civil proceedings to consider using mediation as an alternate means to settle their dispute. The court will require the parties to justify their decision in case they refuse to attempt mediation, failing which adverse costs order may be made against that party, irrespective of the outcome of the litigation.

The court also put the burden on the parties’ legal representatives to advise their clients properly on mediation, as early as possible. In fact, good lawyers in dispute resolution should be in a position to advise their clients of various ways to resolve a dispute. Civil proceedings should not be the only way to resolve disputes among parties in the modern era.

Mediation provides a platform for parties in dispute to discuss their issues in dispute in the presence of a trained and impartial mediator. The role of the mediator is to direct the parties to look at the future, and assist the parties in identifying their needs, in order to explore the alternatives available to the parties in resolving the disputes.

Mediation trumps over court proceedings in many ways:

1. Mediation is less expensive compared with litigation, because of the time involved.

2. The process of mediation is much quicker compared with court proceedings. Mediation can take place within weeks, while court proceedings often go on for years.

3. Some of the disputes and grievances arise out of the parties’ misunderstandings. Through dialogue, parties can be in a better position to understand their respective points of view, and the parties’ ongoing relationship can be saved through clearing such misunderstandings, which is less likely to be achieved through court proceedings.

4. Any resolution made at the end of the mediation would be made by the parties themselves, instead of a third party’s decision imposing on the same.

5. As the outcome is controlled by the parties, parties can tailor their agreement according to their wishes or their situation, and achieve an outcome which may not be achievable through court proceedings.

6. Parties are less likely to be aggrieved by the outcome of the mediation, which is agreed by the parties themselves. The problem of prolonged appeal process would not arise.

7. Parties who mediate their differences are able to attend to the fine details of implementation. Negotiated or mediated agreements can include specially tailored procedures for how the decisions will be carried out. This fact often enhances the likelihood that parties will actually comply with the terms of the settlement.

8. The mediation process, and the end result of the same, is private and confidential, whereas a judgment in court proceedings is often a public record. What the parties discussed throughout the mediation process cannot be used in any court proceedings, thus the parties are at liberty to voice their standpoint freely.

The Law Society of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre both maintain a panel of mediators for the parties to choose, while the Centre for Dispute Resolution is the most influential non-profit mediation body.



ReplyReply

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Fresno Pacific University - campus Fountain

Jim W Hildreth of Real Estate Mediation Services completed 3.5 hours of continuing education at Fresno Paicfic Universitry. The class was Conflict Coaching, Conflict Managment Strategies and Skills for the Individual. The class was taught by Dr. Tricia S Jones

Sacramento Law Libary


Sacramento Law Libary
Originally uploaded by JimHildreth
In order to make myself a better Mediator, Jim W Hildreth of Real Estate Mediation Services took 5 hours of continuing education on Introduction to Legal Research and Law Library Basics on California Statutes & Cases at the Sacramento Law library on 01-30-20010

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Fresno Superior Court


Fresno Superior Court
Originally uploaded by Ed and Lex
Jim W Hildreth of Real Estate Mediation Services has recieved notice that he will be appointed to the civil mediation roster for court appointed mediators.

Hildreth's focus is resolving real estate disputes. Hildreths Superior Court appointments include the courts of Amador, Alameda, Calaveras, Merced and El Dorodo County.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Jim W Hildreth Mediator


Jim W Hildreth
Originally uploaded by JimHildreth
As a mediator, I have been told that I have a communication gift for resolving disputes. I treat each party with respect, honesty and I listen.

Disputes can lead to litigation, stress and can zap precious funds.

Are you having a real estate dispute? Do you have an attorney? Talk to your attorney about Alternative Dispute Resolution which includes mediation.

As a mediator who's focus is real estate issues, I undertstand the language of real property.

Often if the parties are in a dispute, my experience reflects that disputes can be resolved often in hours versus months of litigation.

Mediations are confidential and can be effective, when the parties agree to meet in a neutral setting, with a mediator.

Hildreth serves as both a private mediaitor and a court appointed mediator in Northern California.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Alameda County Bar Association

Jim W Hildreth Mediator has completed continuing education on California Department of Real Estate Enforcement Issues, Foreclosure Consulting, Short Sales and Related Issues.

The event was held January 13th, 2010 at the Alameda County Bar Assoication in Oakland CA,

Hildreth's specialty are disputes involving real estate.